Nevium Intellectual Property Solutions will now discuss what getting sued for copyright infringement Cheap Oakleys means for copyright law. We now come down to the question of distribution and make a distinction between private distribution and public distribution. We have seen this is in copyright law already for example in the between issues of display and issues of performance so private performance is not an Relationship issue with copyright law it is not a copyright violation.
You want to play the piano for your friends at a party go for it okay; play for your play in a bar well then you have to pay because that is a public performance. So we already make this distinction between private Wholesale nfl Jerseys distribution of information and a performance is a distribution of sorts and public distribution. And so it comes and so then when we talk about making copies and we are talking about following this line of distribution it makes sense that we want to have distinction between private distribution protecting this private realm protecting the smaller groups of people your intimate relations the places where private speech is most important and this ferment of creative ideas and creativity should be most protected and then public distribution.
Now do not get me wrong the ability to publicly distribute Cheap Oakleys information is incredibly important and that is why we have things like fair use to protect that right and make exceptions to copyright law for important elements of public distribution. What does this mean for copyright law?
Well you can throw any copyright case out there right now a lot of them and then look at most a lot of our problems just go away they just go away a lot of issues with private use copying and your rights to make use of works that you have pay for they just go away we do not have to argue Well what exactly is a copying? Is it doing cash? Is that a copy or not? Google Books and Search is Google distributing? No they are making copies sure but should be find them liable? Intuitively we say that this does not make sense because they should be able to do this and then as long as they are not actually distributing all these works and not getting them to the public and are merely allowing people to search and find which works they are looking for. They should be allowed to do that or in the MP3.com case where people whether they made all these copies of music so that replica oakleys people put their CDs in and load them well they made a copy it was for commercial purposes.
But they were not distributing the information you had to have access to the information before you could get a cheap nfl jerseys copy of the information so they were not actually engaged in a public distribution in that sense it is perfectly legal for you to upload this stuff and not get sued for copyraight infringement. The fact that MP3.com made a copy beforehand so that you did not have to upload it and save you some time back in the days of dial-up did it but a lot of these cases become much more simple we do not have to worry about a lot of the free speech rights and stuff it is much more protected. And it also matches I think with first of all enforcement capability one thing between a private violate a private distribution and a public distribution a public distribution well the RIAA is going to be able to find out about it whether you are doing it through Napster or a Bythorn or something like that the RIAA can find out about it and they can come after you with a law suit.